Killing queers is a protected right . . . or it aughtta be

•October 22, 2009 • Leave a Comment

A quote from ERLC against legislation that would include perceived sexual orientation, or transgenderedness under hate crimes protections.

The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) and others oppose efforts to expand hate-crimes protections based not only on their inclusion of categories defined by sexual behavior or identity but also because of concerns about the potential impact on religious freedom.

This is outrageous! We must protect the religious freedom to condone the assault and murder of homosexuals in church teachings. Hell we had to limit our lynching blacks talk to KKK meetings, and that’s a 1st amendment tragedy.

Please write to your liberal congressmen and tell them you want to kill queers, be sure to give them your name, address, phone number, church name and a good physical description of yourself.

10 things I love about Boo

•October 22, 2009 • 1 Comment

Yesterday was my wife’s and my 10th together anniversary and 7th wedding anniversary. So in honor of this occasion I present in no particular order . . .

10 things I love about my wife, 7 of which are true:
She enjoys going to my flag football games even when she’s tired
She listens to me when I’m pontificating
She pretends to listen to me when I’m pontificating
Uh, Boobs
She’s smart enough to not be satisfied with mediocrity (enough thought that’s resulted in a 10 bachelor’s degree)
She’s proud of me, even when I do silly things
She’s an emotional anchor when I feel like a loser
She respects my awesome intellect
She laughs at my incredible wit
She puts up with my unmatched ego

GenderBread Sandwich

•September 17, 2009 • Leave a Comment

With MBA and Live Theater filling.
Today has been a long day of many long days. A student by day, I, in a moment of foolish nostalgia, agreed to run sound for play. Not that I need an excuse to stay up too late, I’m a habitual night owl, so its difficult for me to reason myself into going to bed early, getting out of bed in the morning. In fact I mentally reason myself out of my sense of studious obligation with the weak, but persuasive argument, “the bed is so warm though, and you’re already here.”

Today all of my other activities seemed to be sandwiched by, well I’m not sure how to succinctly say but, more or less gender observations.
When I came to school this morning, I walked up the stairs with a metro/hipster looking guy. He had a hip-Asian haircut, a tight black shirt with a white splatter design, designer jeans, and a small messenger bag. The most attractive feature however was his pointed ostrich skin tooled Italian-style boots. By attractive, I mean my eye was attracted to the odd way he walked up the stairs, which then moved to his feet as the source of awkwardness. These boots were so elongated and pointed they were like the new extra-long-don’t-squish-your-toes high heeled shoes. It took a flight to realize that he looked odd because he was trying to plant his whole foot on the step, and his obscenely pointed shoe kept hitting the vertical part of the stair. Then another flight for me to realize that he continued to do it because he’d probably never learned to “Barbie-foot” (as Stan calls it). Called such because you only put the ball of your foot on the step and you keep your heel up. By sight this looks like a Barbie doll foot that is permanently formed for a high heel. Anyone who’s worn high heels knows it’s almost pointless to seek purchase on stairs with that teeny-tiny point below your heel. Surely though, he’s run up stairs?
I’d never considered that someone wouldn’t know how to walk up steps on the balls of his feet. The fact that he hadn’t figured it out by the top of the steps was more surprising. Is it a luxury to always be able to firmly plant your feet, or does it create an inability to move appropriately for a situation? I’m also pretty sure that guys know how to do this, I mean boxers, dancers, they have to know how to move. It struck me as odd, almost as if I was watching a man in drag walk up the steps.

Then at the end of my day, I was sought out for advice from a young lesbian about dating a tranny(FTM). I, however, did not say run for the hills and save yourself. Surprising considering my experience. Rather, it was just sage advice, good for any situation, be honest with yourself about what you want, and be honest with him, blah blah blah. The only thing remarkable about the conversation was when she brought up, as her main objection, not being comfortable on the receiving end of a strap-on. It’s times like this that something comes out of my mouth . . . not intending to be funny, simply trying to make a point. And I quote:

At some point in your lesbian career someone is going to put a dildo in your vagina, so if that’s all that’s holding you back get over it.

This is something I’m glad I get to say. I get frustrated that so many people, and young people still, don’t understand cultural influence on gender, and the difference between gender and sex. But despite having to almost constantly explain that women aren’t biologically ‘feminine’, I’m sincerely glad that I have a different lens to view the world through. It’s like a behind the scenes look at our culture. Or maybe more like watching a horror movie . . . yeah, that may be more realistic, ’cause sometimes I just want scream and throw popcorn at them.

Your Mom has gone too far . . .

•September 3, 2009 • 1 Comment

It’s border line, this compulsion I have to make fun of the “your mom” response, by appropriating it, may have gone too far.

Stan: Judas from Jesus Christ Superstar was in “The Color Purple”

Me: Your mom was in “The Color Purple”

I may need help . . .

Also I told Jesse he’s so gay it should be a sin. What is wrong with me?

Love This!

•September 3, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Circle Drive

See more here, like the Escher-like staircase sculpture. Its one of the few post that’s in English not German.

I’m Convinced My Roommate Suffers from Brain Damage

•September 3, 2009 • Leave a Comment

And furthermore that it stems from Anorexia Nervosa.

She’s displays the classic symptoms of this disorder (specifically overly concerned with body image, excessive exercising, making food for others and not eating it) which can cause brain damage as well as a host of other delightful impairments (liver failure, coma, arthritis, kidney disease and failure).

I say this because, first of all she doesn’t believe in evolution, but teaches children about dinosaurs. And a few minutes ago I after taking out the trash, I came inside to see her attempting to replace the trash bag with a recycling bag. Our city has a specific color assigned to recyclables that you buy from the city. By itself that might not be so weird, but I asked her why she was getting a new bag when there was an empty bag in a container labeled “recycle” next to the bag-less trash can. And she said oh, this isn’t for the trash? No. (which she knows already, this isn’t new information) she also happened to have a plastic bottle she was trying to recycle, which she then indicates and says this is recyclable though right? Uhhmm. Yeah.

Was this a misunderstanding? I’m confused. There was clearly a receptacle for recyclables and it was empty (as in the opposite of full) and she’s never seen any color but a black bag in the trash can. And she’s lived here a least half a year.

Therefore the only answer is permanent irreparable brain damage. And/Or I just hate her, and want her to pay me rent and live elsewhere.

Oh, and she doesn’t understand why the government won’t give her government scholarships for school when she’s defaulted on a government loan. Despite the fact that it clearly states this on every financial aid website, that those are just the rules. I wouldn’t give money for free to someone who refuses to pay the money they borrowed, and I am the government. “But I’m not asking for a loan . . .” . . .hate. . .

Professors, oh how they profess!

•September 1, 2009 • Leave a Comment

But I digress I confess, lets progress . . .
.
One day I hope to be a PhD. so I can be as pompous. I’ve heard a couple of ideas for what PhD stands for other than Philosophical Doctorate, such as Permanent head Damage, and the like. I’d have to say in terms of describing the post-doctorate attitude, it is more likely Projected Historical Demeanor. That is to say if you were an unforgivable ass before your dissertation, you are more so.
I’ve already made a wonderful impression on one of the faculty in the School of Management. As a pseudonym I will refer to him as Dr. Docker. In the initial meet and greet this is how our first impression commenced:

Dr. Docker: (I walked into the middle of the conversation): Blah, blah blah The G.I. Bill put me through undergrad, and they held off my deployment so I could finish my MBA, half of which I took my senior year. As soon as I graduated they sent me off to the Vietnam War. I was assigned in Hong Kong as the commander of an re-engineering mission and my ship never the dock. But I got my Commander-at-Sea pin. (seems to me to be joking, in fact he’s VERY proud of his pin).
Me: I guess they don’t have a Commander-At-Dock pin.
**BoMbS**
Dr. Docker: Ahem. (back to him) My son-in-laws both have their doctorates, but they don’t have their Commander-at-Sea Pin, and they won’t have their chance to get it now. Blah, blah, blah

Me: (sneaking away)

Wow. So luckily he’s an elective instructor, so I never have to take his classes, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have a chance to reap revenge for my disrespect.

The next day he presented a mini-lecture to our class about team work and presentations. The first presentation team that went he ripped a new one (unfairly so). He said something to the effect of, “Your teammates look bored, if you can’t keep them interested how are you going to keep your audience interested.” Ummm, he designed the content of the presentation, and that was the least interesting part. Oh not to mention that half the class was asleep by the end of his lecture.
But his sweet revenge was collected the next day during a team tower building exercise. The point was to build the highest tower, with the builder blind folded using only their non-dominant hand and only one seeing person communicating with the builder. I was the builder, and we blew everyone else’s tower away. At the last few seconds I put the final blocks on, and was oh so slowly taking my hand away (so I wouldn’t knock over anything) , clearly outstretched to indicate I was not holding anything. He claimed to have said stop prior to the placement of the last few blocks, and subsequently removed them, making our tower shorter, and below our stated goal therefore disqualifying us.

I’m no sore loser, and I can do without a prize of candy or a coffee mug, and I was happy to congratulate the winners. But this guy clearly enjoys taking something from others, whether or not it is important to them. Maybe his sons don’t give a damn about the pin, but he sure as heck makes it an issue. I was a little worried that most of my professors would in some way like him.
There is no shortage of pompasity(?) but for the most part little meanspiritedness, just ‘I’m right and you’re wrong’.
I have noticed specifically at UTD, you are expected to teach yourself the material.
Generally that’s true for all my classes, but my instructors are open to question. However one class in particular irks me, I wouldn’t mind so much if the material are evaluated on was a least referred to in class, but as it is, it seems like we are a captive audience to an unhelpful powerpoint presentation (that was already posted online). We don’t discuss the material Socratically, if we ask a question we aren’t given a helpful answer, or even one that makes you think.
I understand that Professors are supposed to profess, but lets talk about the subject they are pedigreed for.

Damn China’s communistic approach to clean energy!

•August 25, 2009 • Leave a Comment

and the U.S.’s Free Market

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/business/energy-environment/25solar.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Oh, well, now I can have cheap Chinese solar panels to implement all the changes I want upon corporate America.

Back to School: The Old Desk and Chain

•August 19, 2009 • Leave a Comment

It’s the time of year when everyone gets in a tissy over students returning, or starting school. News outlets love them some back to school coverage and I want them to stop. All this coverage of students being under-prepared for the challenges ahead makes me worry about the state of the country. Worried only because I see the makings of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This article from MSNBC discusses pre-kindergarten tutoring. Maybe I was an advanced kid, but it seems I already knew how to nap, cry and throw up at that age. But apparently it’s academic tutoring on mostly reading and writing. Child behavior specialist know that kids have developmental stages where certain understanding is impossible, and every kid develops at a different pace. Luckily for me my parents were fairly ignorant of this and the importance of 5-year old private tutors. They actually read to me because I liked it, and it was a good way to pass the time. My brother even taught me multiplication simply because he was excited about it, and that excitement was infectious. Because math, reading and writing was an enjoyable experience it likely resulted in my academic success. I worry that the pressure kids face to perform ultimately ruins their desire and enjoyment for learning. And I’m surprised that parents want to stress themselves out over 2nd grade reading level at 5 years old. What are they going to assimilate in those two years that’s going to make so much of a difference? Is a Noble Laureate going to credit his success to researching what happens if you give a mouse a cookie? It is illustrated after all, no need to read.

It seems like it isn’t helping much as these kids get older. Recently I heard a radio program (NPR of course) about college freshman being under-prepared. Because of the pressure for decreased homework assignments in high school in order to focus on standardized test preparation, many freshman don’t know how to manage time. Furthermore parents (who want their kids to get into the best schools via highest GPA) increasingly act as enablers of responsibility shurking. Principles are pressured by parents to discipline teachers who grade too harshly. In my college classes the students would complain about a ‘difficult’ assignment or whine about the due date until the teacher caved. These parents think they are creating successful students, but that’s just on their high school transcript. In reality parents who constantly usurp the education system to benefit their son or daughter’s GPA are creating the asshole at work . . . um I mean adults who feel entitled to things they haven’t earned. More over this radio program talked about how more than 40% of new college students took remedial courses in reading and writing last year. That’s surprising considering most of these kids were in pre-k and kindergarten memorizing colors, numbers and U.S. Presidents.
What’s the point of all this pre-k prep if all they’re expected to is pass a basic skills test?
All that said, I’m finishing up my two week orientation for business school. I’ve be repeatedly reminded that this is going to be a challenge and a heavy workload, but I was told as much in undergrad, and it wasn’t true. The challenges I’ve face so far in this life haven’t involved a heavy work load, having a breadth of knowledge, but adjusting my expectations, ways of thinking and ways dealing with problems. And it is these skills, and a willingness to adapt effectively that will help them from pre-k to post-graduate studies.

All we want to do is eat your brains . . .

•August 19, 2009 • Leave a Comment

We’re not unreasonable, I mean no one’s going to eat your eyes.